Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Alcohol > Drug Overdose

Statistics are really just the observation of what most of us know already, but they do help to put a face to the world we live in. 
We see the damage in our communities, the anger problems, road rage, breakdown of families, abused kids, sexual assaults, rapes in and out of family circles, vandalism, late night fights and damage, drunken pregnancies, random sex, lots of tears and broken people and the highest suicide rate in the world in Aotearoa.  

Is that it? Not by a long shot...

STATS

  • Alcohol-related crime accounts for a third of all police apprehensions
  •  70% of all emergency hospital admissions are due to alcohol
  • $425 million was paid out by ACC for alcohol-related injuries in 2007
  •  half of all serious violent crimes are related to alcohol
  • the cost to the public health sector is $655 million a year (which is up to 10% of the health budget), and perhaps the most telling statistic is that
  •  90% of the total of 8000 prison inmates have an alcohol or drug problem. 
  • According to a Massey University study of 16,500 people published in the New Zealand Medical Journal nearly 7 per cent of men and 3 per cent of women had been physically assaulted in the previous year. One in 100 women had been sexually assaulted, and one in 200 men. More than half the physical and sexual assaults were by people who had been drinking. 
  • Alcohol consumption also increased people's chances of being a victim. The research suggested there were more than 62,000 assaults every year by people who had been drinking alcohol. 

It is essential that we address these issues through a new approach to the law. The Kiwi Party is making a submission on that now to the Law Commission, as are many others. I don't hate alcohol, but I'm not stupid either. It is destroying the people we love in this nation. I lost many years myself as a 'last one standing social drinker' (that's perhaps French for 'chronic alcoholic') and damaged many people along the way, I knew better all along but 'under the influence' means just that. That influence needs to be stopped. 

RESEARCH

Research just released by a team from Melbourne's Murdoch Children's Research Institute says its study, which has tracked 1520 young people's drinking habits over more than 10 years from mid-teens to mid-20s, shows there is no safe or sensible level of drinking for adolescents in light of later likely events. 

National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines define a low-risk level of drinking for adults as fewer than three standard drinks a day. The research found teenagers, drinking at even this level, increased their chances of alcohol abuse, social or legal problems or alcohol-related high-risk sexual behaviour 10 years down the track. 

Those who abstained from any alcohol in adolescence experienced fewer (bad) alcohol-related outcomes than those who drank at the recommended level. 

The research, published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, found that by young adulthood, 27 per cent of men and 13 per cent of women met at least one of the criteria for alcohol abuse and risky sexual behaviour. 

The age at which children begin drinking appears to be linked to their later propensity for harmful drinking, with the chances of becoming alcohol-dependent decreasing by 14% for each year of delay in the onset of alcohol use. (Spear, L.P., The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 24 (2000) 417-463). 

Friday, October 23, 2009

Global Warming to the T

the more ya dig, the more money you stumble across on the way down. I
have to say, this global warming has got to be one of the better scams
to hit the earth. The perfect smoke screen to a money making
wonderland. With the world low on resources and most of those
resources found in 3rd world countries it only makes sense that we the
western socialists would find it a way to make ourselves feel happy
about robbing those countries to feed the greed. All the while
declaring it in the name of care.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

What are you smokin in Iran?

So the internationals have struck a deal to enrich Iran's uranium. Russia ups the quality, then gives it back. France may or may not be given the go ahead to makes plates for medical production in US machines... SO basically Iran hasn't had to do anything, not even to STOP enriching Uranium, and what they get in return is enriched Uranium, albeit not to weapons grade at 20% enriched, but up to 5% enriched which is closer than their technology would have gotten them.
There must be an agenda in there somewhere because this deal could have been done by retarded monkeys... So who is going to get what from this one?
Ahmadinejad: Bye-bye, security? AP